Sorry for double-posting, the former variant was the right one.
Thomas Gelf schrieb:
> Another thing I stumbled over is one missing test in client_nat_test():
> test 1 is the same in both modules, nat_traversal's test 2 corresponds
> to 18 (2 & 16) in nathelper's nat_uac_test, test 8 (search RFC1918
> addresses in the SDP payload) has no equivalent in client_nat_test().
>
> Is test 8 useless? Is anyone aware of scenarios where RFC1918 could
> appear in SDP, even with a correct SIP header? I know that EVERYTHING is
> possible with a braindead ALG - but are there other situations where
> this could happen? I wasn't able to figure out such an example, so
> client_nat_test("7") should probably suffice.
>
> Best regards,
> Thomas Gelf
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
