Migration from nathelper? What's this you say? :) Can you for us "users" out here explain the implication of a new "nathelper"? Is nat_traveral intended to replace nathelper? What's new? Am I jumping the gun asking these questions? :)
Thanks! -Brett On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected] > wrote: > Dan, what about this? this will accelerate the migration from nathelper > to nat_tranversal module, what do you say? > > As time as it is not technical nightmare (from implementation point of > view), this feature make sense to me. > > Regards, > Bogdan > > Thomas Gelf wrote: > > I would also like to take occasion to propose a new feature: adding a > > parameter named "keepalive_interval_avp", allowing to set individual > > keepalive intervals for customers with special needs. > > > > Also "keepalive_method_avp" would be a useful addition. Both changes > > would probably require modifications to keepalive_state_file and > > corresponding internal structures, but I think this could be solved > > in a backward-compatible manner. > > > > Best regards, > > Thomas Gelf > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
