Hi Inaki, Yes, the specifications in RFC 4745 are for the presence server. And opensips presence server implements this rfc. It is also mentioned in the readme document for presence_xml module: http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/devel/presence_xml.html#id227122
regards, Anca Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > 2009/6/16 Luci Stanescu <[email protected]>: > >> Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: >> >> Hi Iñaki, >> >> >>> Hi, does OpenXCAP implement RFC 4745 (Common Policy: A Document Format >>> for Expressing Privacy Preferences)? >>> I understand that this feature would be implemented by the XCAP server >>> itself, am I right? >>> >> OpenXCAP supports RFC5025 (Presence Authorization Rules) which is an >> extension to RFC4745. RFC4745 does not define an XCAP application, but >> rather a framework for defining authorization rules. So I do not really >> understand what exactly you mean by a RFC4745 implementation in an XCAP >> server. On another note, an XCAP server is responsible for storing XML >> documents, it's the role of another entity (for example, the presence >> agent in the case of pres-rules) to interprete them and act accordingly. >> > > You are completely right, thanks. I didn't understand the purpose of > RFC 4745 by reading some lines of it. > So, the presence agent (which could be OpenSIPs xcap_client module or > OpenSIPS presence module itself when "integrated_xcap") is responsible > to understand the conditions appearing in the pres-rules documents, > i.e: from 9:00 to 12:00 show me as busy. > Am I right? > > Thanks a lot. > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
