Hi Andrew,
Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote: > Hi, > > From http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.5.x/tm.html#id228479: > > fr_inv_timer (integer) > > Timer which hits if no final reply for an INVITE arrives after a > provisional message was received (in seconds). This timer is started > after the first provisional response. yes, the fr_inv_timer starts after receiving a provisional reply. > Thus, fast failover (no 100 trying > from gateway) can be achieved by setting fr_timer to low values. fr_timer is between the request being sent out and the first reply being received. After receiving the first provisional reply, the fr_inv_timer takes over the fr_timer. Note there are 2 timers : fr_timer and fr_inv_timer ! Regards, Bogdan > See > example below > > Isn't there a contradiction between 2nd and 3rd sentences? If the timer > is really started after the first provisional response (e.g. 100), it > can't affect the time we wait for the receipt of 100 from the gateway. > Of course source code will clarify this for me, but I just want to point > out this mismatch. Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
