On Monday 27 July 2009 10:01:45 Adrian Georgescu wrote: > Inaki, > > If this discusion took place two years ago you would have said the > opposite simply because the 'stable' distribution was so obsolete. Now > the stable is pretty much in sync (still) with unstable hence it seems > a good idea to use stable at this very moment. If we look again over > 12 and 24 months, maybe then we have a better measurement. > > Adrian
Never, on production enviroments ALLWAYS Debian stable, and if I have to backport, I do it .. I backported postgresl 8.3 with pgcluster support to a Debian Stable more than a year ago ... and that's a big job, doing the same with AG soft are very, very simple tasks it we compare them. But that are just POV's. I have no problem at all if AG continues to use unstable ... it's up to you and your customers, I'll port the packages I need to my working enviroments. -- Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana Dimensión Virtual _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
