Iñaki, >From a purely philosophical perspective, I have nothing to add. I don¹t know.
>From an application perspective, this is exactly what we¹ve been waiting for. Even if it doesn¹t function in all cases for everyone, it will function in most portions of our network where only G.711 and G.729 are used on unencrypted messaging. It¹s perfect. It allows the scalability and ³lightweight²-ness of a proxy while giving us very useful features we otherwise wouldn¹t have. I can¹t wait to test it. - Jeff On 7/28/09 4:34 AM, "Iñaki Baz Castillo" <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Andrei. Please don't take me wrong, but is this a task for a proxy? I wonder what would occur in the following cases: - The UAC/UAS use encrypted SDP (S/MIME...). - The UAC/UAS use multipart content (some devices do it for an INVITE). >From some time I'm realizing that OpenSIPS is trying to behave as a B2BUA, or it wants to manage dialogs (and it doesn't do it properly) and now it handles the SDP (just in case the SDP comes not encrypted in a single part body). Is it really the target of a proxy?
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
