Hi Bogdan,
On 7/28/09 11:46 AM, "Bogdan-Andrei Iancu" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > I agree that the RFC3261 keeps this requirement only for backcompat > reasons. unfortunately, if we cannot rely on the uri preserving, we will > have to store both the old and new uri in the message so that we can > restore it when coming from both up and down stream directions. This can > be done, be it will generate some huge RR headers.... Yuck. Moving right along... > Options 2 is to to use dialog module as support for locally storing the > changed URI, but it will create the dependency to the dialog module. This seems like a viable option, as long as these values could be stored in the database with the proper dbmode set on the dialog module. Or, maybe a new dbmode option on the uac module? - Jeff _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
