Hi Iñaki, I agree that are some functionalities that are still in process of maturing ....and maybe of finding better ways of putting all these together in a simple way (from scripting perspective). But the idea is to make them stable, so underlining what are the weak points, it is a constructive approach - each of us is using a certain set of module, in a limited number of scenarios.....so, no one can cover everything from usage and specs point of view :)
So, I'm more interested in this discussion from the point were I can learn what are the weak points / limitations of the current code ;) The dialog module was developed with the only purpose to keep state from a proxy perspective (a pass-through dialog monitor) - I never experienced PRACK, so do not know what works or not for it....parallel forking should work..if not, let me know Best regards, Bogdan Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > El Martes, 28 de Julio de 2009, Adrian Georgescu escribió: > >> Making arbitrary judgements about others people work just for the sake >> of not agreeing with them is not adding any value, is it? >> > > Ok, if you prefer I would say that, IMHO, such new features would fit better > on top of a real b2bua module. > > Justification (related to dialog module): The base in which such new features > rely should be robust, secure and reliable. Dialog module has some important > limitations (not so important if we expect OpenSIPS just for routing traffic > to a boring PSTN gateway). So all the modules relying on dialog module > inherit > its limitations (obviously). > > This is the only added value I can contribute to my comment. > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
