Yep. Seems straight-forward to me.
On 8/5/09 10:03 AM, "Darren Sessions" <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree completely. > > - Darren > > > On Aug 5, 2009, at 7:58 AM, Brett Nemeroff wrote: > >> I agree with you here. Even if it's "different" than the way most of your >> other lists work, "Poster" simply makes more sense. And I don't think another >> way should be picked because the poster might do the wrong thing. I think >> it's up to all of us to reply to the list as appropriate. >> >> For me, If I'm reading a message from a specific person, and I hit "reply" >> I'm replying to that person. If I hit "reply to all" I'm replying to >> everyone. This just makes sense to me. >> >> >> And if you set to "The List", it's very hard to reply to the poster. Since >> neither reply to reply-all will get you the email of the poster. >> -Brett >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Dan Pascu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Wednesday 05 August 2009, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: >>>> > "normal" is a fuzzy word. I can do the change, not a problem, but just >>>> > to past what mailman says: >>>> > >>>> > "Where are replies to list messages directed? Poster is *strongly* >>>> > recommended for most mailing lists. -> Poster This list >>>> > Explicit address " >>>> > >>>> > Currently is "Poster"(which is recommended) and you suggest "This List". >>>> > >>>> > To be honest I consider logical the "Poster" setting as primarily I'm >>>> > talking with a person on the list and not to the list. >>>> > >>>> > But any other opinions are welcome here. >>> >>> >>> "The List" is a worse choice than "Poster" because it limits my choice of >>> whom >>> I want to reply to and makes it more complicated to reply to the sender >>> alone. >>> When using "The List", if I want to reply to the sender alone, I need to >>> employ manual copy/paste of his address, after I manually delete the list >>> address which was automatically added when replying. This is awkward and >>> annoying. >>> >>> With "Poster", I can easily use reply, to reply to the sender alone, or >>> "reply >>> all" to send to both the poster and the list and the list will make sure >>> the >>> poster will receive a single copy anyway. >>> >>> I don't think nowadays it could be an issue to anyone, as I can't imagine a >>> mail user agent without a "Reply all" function. >>> >>> -- >>> Dan >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
