Olle E. Johansson schrieb: > 10 aug 2009 kl. 18.31 skrev Ricardo Martins: > >> Hi all! I found some performance reports about asterisk handling a 250 >> calls per second limit with a 2.8GHz processor what makes it quite >> bigger than transnexus reports for openser performance (60 calls per >> second per GHz). >> >> Did opensips make this limit even high, like handling 100 or 200 cals >> per second on each GHz of processor power? >> >> In a strict sip proxy scenario, there is any good advantage to use >> opensips instead of asterisk with directrtpsetup=yes statement on? > > Just an observation. The "Directrtpsetup" option is highly > experimental and can cause issues when you have more than one codec in > your call path through Asterisk. If you only have one well known codec
Also in 1.6.x? regards klaus > in your call path, then everything is fine. The difference is that > without directrtpsetup asterisk will re-invite the audio, which from a > user perspective is the same thing. > > /O > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
