Hi,
Not all the time, depending on the configuration - in some performance
and profiling tests we are using both SIPP and OpenSIPS to
test....OpenSIPS :). I found out that it is simpler and more efficient
to use an OpenSIPS on the UAS side, rather than SIPP.
So instead of :
SIPP (UAC) -----> OpenSIPS (proxy) -------- > SIPP (UAS)
you can also do:
SIPP (UAC) -----> OpenSIPS (proxy) -------- > OpenSIPS (UAS)
and getting the same call flow.
Of course, this works only if you are interested in signalling part and
not in media too.
Regards,
Bogdan
[email protected] wrote:
> Sipp would probably suit your needs for this better.
>
>
> ------Original Message------
> From: Matthew S. Crocker
> Sender: [email protected]
> To: users
> ReplyTo: OpenSIPS users mailling list
> Sent: Aug 22, 2009 8:30 AM
> Subject: [OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS as a honeypot?
>
>
> Would it be possible to configure OpenSIPS has a honeypot server? I'd like
> to configure it to listen on :5060 and process all INVITES that come in (send
> 100 Trying, 183 Ringing, 200 OK). Call progress would proceed as normal but
> calls wouldn't actually be connected. Establishing an RTP stream with a
> mediaproxy/recorder would be a bonus.
>
> -Matt
>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
