Helo again,
I have started dumping around on the server and I think it is actually
a bug in the snom. As you can see in the following log, the REGISTER
contains my old IP address. Shouldn't it get a new one from the STUN
server? Why is this request refused by my OpenSIPS and not by any
other server I am using (i.e. sip2sip.info whis is running OpenSIPS
1.4.5 (I think))? Oh an one more thing. The server responds with 401,
but this message doesn't even appear in the m3's log.
Petr
Here is a bit from tcpdump:
20:44:33.708443 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 49, id 24546, offset 0, flags [none],
proto UDP (17), length 537) 91.51.119.228.61001 > 81.169.132.241.5060:
SIP, length: 509
REGISTER sip:madnetwork.org SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 91.51.107.118:61000;branch=z9hG4bKgygurbkseafq96sn1f
Max-Forwards: 70
From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=mc9k914b
To: <sip:[email protected]>
Call-ID: 8i4xflcj9orx8wph.p0hmnv9buua42
CSeq: 38204 REGISTER
Contact: <sip:[email protected]:61000;line=13252>
Allow: INVITE, CANCEL, BYE, ACK, REGISTER, OPTIONS, REFER,
SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, INFO, PRACK
Expires: 600
User-Agent: snom-m3-SIP/02.02 (MAC=0004132A9180; HW=1)
Content-Length: 0
20:44:33.708967 IP (tos 0x10, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF],
proto UDP (17), length 501) 81.169.132.241.5060 > 91.51.119.228.61000:
SIP, length: 473
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
91.51.107.118:61000;branch=z9hG4bKgygurbkseafq96sn1f;received=91.51.119.228
From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=mc9k914b
To: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=92fbbc76078921fe49ac1acde8d8d9b2.2ec1
Call-ID: 8i4xflcj9orx8wph.p0hmnv9buua42
CSeq: 38204 REGISTER
WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="madnetwork.org",
nonce="4a9d6cbd00001cf0456070be74dc7ef3e3a8a6d74b282478"
Server: OpenSIPS (1.4.1-tls (i386/linux))
Content-Length: 0
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 15:47, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> But if opensips does not even get the REGISTER, it is hard to blame it
> :)...As you said, check with wireshark to be sure that the send
> REGISTER actually gets to the server where opensips is running.
>
> Regards,
> Bogdan
>
> Petr Man wrote:
>> Hi,
>> the m3 keeps sending REGISTER and doesn't get any response back. It
>> kind of looks like as if the request never reached the server. They
>> appear in the phone's log, but I didn't check yet if they are really
>> sent by the phone. I will try it with wireshark.
>> Petr
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 09:33, Bogdan-Andrei
>> Iancu<[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Petr,
>>>
>>> When you say your registration fails after the IP change, what exactly
>>> means? you snom phone does not simply send any more registers (after the
>>> previous one expired) or, you get a negative reply from opensips at a
>>> new registration attempt?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Bogdan
>>>
>>> Petr Man wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello list,
>>>> I have asked on the Snom forum about my problem with m3 phone in
>>>> conjunction with the OpenSIPS server a few weeks ago without any
>>>> helpful hints, where the problem might be. The original message is
>>>> here http://forum.snom.com/index.php?showtopic=1944.
>>>> My internet connection is an ADSL with regular interrupts every 24
>>>> hours (to prevent/make harder to have i.e. webhosting on you home
>>>> connection...). The router receives a different IP every time. After
>>>> the reconnection all the accounts configured on my phone successfully
>>>> register, except for the OpenSIPS server I am running myself. The
>>>> server has a static IP and is located somewhere in a collocation. When
>>>> I used a softphone and forced the router to get a new public IP, the
>>>> softphone didn't have a problem re-registering with the server.
>>>> Reseting the phone helps.
>>>> I suspect this is a firmware bug in the m3, but maybe someone has an
>>>> idea how to fix this, because the problem appears only with OpenSIPS.
>>>> The log from the phone is not helpful at all it shows a bunch of
>>>> register requests, but no answer. I haven't found any register
>>>> requests in the OpenSIPS log from that particular phone in the debug
>>>> mode, but I might have overlooked them. What should I put to the
>>>> config file to isolate the request I am looking for?
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Petr
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
