Hi Thomas,
such naming in variables will complicate too much the code (complexity
and performance) - and personally do not think it is good approach to
compromise the performance of all cases just to make a corner case
simpler :)
Regards,
Bogdan
Thomas Gelf wrote:
> "Better"-looking constructs like
> $dlg("br_" + $T_branch_idx + "_mp")
>
> are not (yet?) possible, but at least as shown above it (should) work.
> Why I'm doing so? This simulates "per-branch-dialog-vars". You are now
> able to fork an INVITE transaction to multiple endpoints with different
> requirements to your routing script (e.g. whether to use mediaproxy or
> not).
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
