Thanks for checking Bogdan... When I populated my table back up to +34 records the problem did not re-occur. I guess I had some bad data before. I had tried so many variations, I was sure I had eliminated bad data as the problem, but now I cannot replicate it. Sorry!
Russ -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bogdan-Andrei Iancu Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 12:22 PM To: OpenSIPS users mailling list Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Load Balance Module URI Limit Hi Russell, I tried to reproduce this report (have 35 records in the same group, with one resource), but with no success. The load_balance() function returns true. Let's try the followings: 1) set full debug (debug=4) and send me the logs for the balanced request. 2) if you can sent me the DB content you use and the LB script command, it will also help. Regards, Bogdan Russell Bierschbach wrote: > 1.6 > > version: opensips 1.6.0dev0-notls (x86_64/linux) > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 10:39 AM > To: OpenSIPS users mailling list > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Load Balance Module URI Limit > > OK - I will try to reproduce it. BTW, trunk or 1.5 ? > > Regards, > Bogdan > > Russell Bierschbach wrote: > >> The load_balance() call returns false when there are 34 or more records in >> the table. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bogdan-Andrei Iancu >> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 2:18 AM >> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Load Balance Module URI Limit >> >> Hi Russell, >> >> So, if there are more than 34 records in DB, the LB will fails? by >> failing what you mean ? it does not start or load_balance() returns >> false all the time? >> >> Regards, >> Bogdan >> >> Russell Bierschbach wrote: >> >> >>> The load_balance() call always fails if there 34 or more entries in >>> the load_balancer table. I have confirmed that it's not a problem >>> with the entries themselves (I've tried other entries that all work >>> when there are 33 or less records). I have also changed the shared >>> memory from the default of 32 to 64, but that didn't seem to help. Is >>> there some other configuration I'm missing, or is this a limitation of >>> the load balancer module... is there any place I can change it? >>> >>> >>> >>> version: opensips 1.6.0dev0-notls (x86_64/linux) >>> >>> >>> >>> Russ >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
