Hello Bogdan, An mer., janv 20, 2010, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb: >[email protected] wrote: >> Because nat_traversal is newer and seems to be where most of the NAT >> logic will be developed in the future, it seems the natural choice. >> If I'm right about that, >That's not really true. > >nathelper is used together with rtpproxy (as media rely), while >nat_traversal in used together with mediaproxy. Both are to be developed >as alternative solutions to the same problem (at least for the moment) > Thanks for clearing that up. It seems strange that so many features of both modules indent to do the same thing.
>> How do I stop using the fix_nated_sdp() function from nathelper? >> Is there such a function in the nat_traversal module, or is there >> another way to achieve the same thing without using nathelper? >> >nat_traversal module provides support only for signalling part (afaik) >and not for media/SDP part. If you need the functionality of >fix_nated_sdp(), you need nathelper module. > Okay, I'll go back to using the nathelper module. The mediaproxy and rtpproxy components don't interest me at all, though. Greetings, Brian _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
