I'm certainly open to trying new things. But without looking into the complexities of the newer systems, I know that they can get very complicated very quickly. I do like, however, integrated code hosting, like you suggested. But I know similar options are available with SVN.
Personally, I don't care as long as it's easy to pull from a command line. :) right? -Brett On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:19 PM, David J. <[email protected]> wrote: > Brett, > > From a user perspective then its not so difficult to learn a few extra > commands. > Most users I would imagine want to download the code and compile. > > Although, I agree that SVN is by far more adopted. > > I think going forward, companies like GitHub and BitBucket offer great > code hosting options for developers, which seems to be gaining lots of > traction. Most projects I see are moving off google code which I believe > is svn based. > > I personally have invested lots of time in SVN, but wouldn't think it > would be a burden to try something new. > > Just an opinion. > > > > > Brett Nemeroff wrote: > > Bogdan, > > I personally really like SVN. It's widely accepted and well > > documented. I'm sure that some newer code repo systems offer some > > really nice features, but I'm curious what percent of the community > > has used newer repo types and would be comfortable using them to their > > full potential (properly!). > > > > I'm speaking, of course, as a user and not a developer. > > > > Thanks for your consideration. :) > > > > -Brett > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > As we are getting closed to first working code for OpenSIPS 2.0 (a > > proto > > core including config, transport, threading, reactor and > > dispatcher), we > > will upload the code the public SF repo. > > > > I would like to get some feedback from you about what repo type to > > use - > > as we have the opportunity to start a fresh new piece of code, we > have > > the option to use a different repo than SVN. > > > > SF offers the following options > > - SVN > > - git > > - mercurial > > - bazaar > > > > Should we keep SVN ? pros ? minuses ? something much better ? > > > > > > Regards, > > Bogdan > > > > PS: should we create a poll on the project web site ? > > > > -- > > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > > www.voice-system.ro <http://www.voice-system.ro> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
