Hi Pascal,

Only now I observed that there is a Route header in the Notify - so the 
first hop is in fact the address in the route and not the RURI. So it is 
correct to send the Notify on udp, and the proxy at the next hop should 
switch to tcp.

Regards,

-- 
Anca Vamanu
www.voice-system.ro



Pascal Maugeri wrote:
> Anca
>
> I got the following logs when subscribing:
>
>     Mar 11 15:28:40 test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[3258]:
>     DBG:presence:build_dlg_t: CONTACT =
>     sip:[email protected]:5060;transport=tcp
>     Mar 11 15:28:40 test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[3258]: DBG:tm:t_uac:
>     next_hop=<sip:213.151.105.170:6666;lr=on>
>     Mar 11 15:28:40 test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[3258]:
>     DBG:core:mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup...
>     Mar 11 15:28:40 test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[3258]:
>     DBG:tm:dlg2hash: 42964
>     Mar 11 15:28:40 test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[3258]:
>     DBG:tm:print_request_uri: sip:[email protected]:5060;transport=tcp
>     Mar 11 15:28:40 test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[3258]:
>     DBG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is 500000
>     Mar 11 15:28:40 test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[3258]:
>     DBG:tm:insert_timer_unsafe: [4]: 0x7f8fa84c0068 (4508500000)
>     Mar 11 15:28:40 test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[3258]:
>     DBG:tm:set_timer: relative timeout is 30
>     Mar 11 15:28:40 test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[3258]:
>     DBG:tm:insert_timer_unsafe: [0]: 0x7f8fa84c0098 (4538)
>     Mar 11 15:28:40 test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[3258]:
>     INFO:presence:send_notify_request: NOTIFY
>     sip:[email protected]
>     <mailto:sip%[email protected]> via
>     sip:213.151.105.170:6666;lr=on on behalf of
>     sip:[email protected]
>     <mailto:sip%[email protected]> for event presence
>     Mar 11 15:28:40 test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[3258]:
>     DBG:tm:t_unref: UNREF_UNSAFE: after is 0
>     Mar 11 15:28:40 test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[3258]:
>     DBG:core:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil)
>     Mar 11 15:28:40 test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[3258]:
>     DBG:core:receive_msg: cleaning up
>     Mar 11 15:28:40 test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[3259]:
>     DBG:core:parse_msg: SIP Reply  (status):
>     Mar 11 15:28:40 test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[3259]:
>     DBG:core:parse_msg:  version: <SIP/2.0>
>     Mar 11 15:28:40 test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[3259]:
>     DBG:core:parse_msg:  status:  <200>
>     Mar 11 15:28:40 test /usr/local/sbin/opensips[3259]:
>     DBG:core:parse_msg:  reason:  <OK>
>
>
> What log could I add to your patch so we can get more details ?
>
> I recompiled the whole opensips and its modules just to make sure your 
> patch is activated.
>
> Cheers
> Pascal
>

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to