Bogdan, Still I am a bit worried of the sequence in 1.6.2 where I miss the dialog build part as per 1.6.1 :
In 1.6.2 I got : ... Mar 22 22:38:10 [2889] DBG:rr:after_loose: No next URI found Mar 22 22:38:10 [2889] DBG:rr:run_rr_callbacks: callback id 0 entered with <lr=on> Mar 22 22:38:10 [2889] DBG:dialog:dlg_onroute: Route param 'did' not found Whereas in 1.6.1 I got : ... Mar 23 20:40:41 [9757] DBG:dialog:build_new_dlg: new dialog 0x2b5da3822c68 ([email protected],f=sip:[email protected],t=sip:1234567 [email protected]:5071,ft=as369d25ef) on hash 2503 ... Mar 23 20:40:58 [9757] DBG:rr:after_loose: No next URI found Mar 23 20:40:58 [9757] DBG:rr:run_rr_callbacks: callback id 0 entered with <lr=on;did=7c9.4c658cd3> Mar 23 20:40:58 [9757] DBG:dialog:dlg_onroute: route param is '7c9.4c658cd3' (len=12) Mar 23 20:40:58 [9757] DBG:dialog:lookup_dlg: ref dlg 0x2b5da3822c68 with 1 -> 3 Mar 23 20:40:58 [9757] DBG:dialog:lookup_dlg: dialog id=1036539588 found on entry 2503 Mar 23 20:40:58 [9757] DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=48 Mar 23 20:40:58 [9757] DBG:core:parse_to_param: tag=as369d25ef Mar 23 20:40:58 [9757] DBG:core:parse_to: end of header reached, state=29 Mar 23 20:40:58 [9757] DBG:core:parse_to: display={"test"}, ruri={sip:[email protected]} Mar 23 20:40:58 [9757] DBG:dialog:next_state_dlg: dialog 0x2b5da3822c68 changed from state 4 to state 5, due event 7 Mar 23 20:40:58 [9757] DBG:dialog:dlg_onroute: BYE successfully processed Mar 23 20:40:58 [9757] DBG:dialog:run_dlg_callbacks: dialog=0x2b5da3822c68, type=32 Mar 23 20:40:58 [9757] DBG:dialog:unref_dlg: unref dlg 0x2b5da3822c68 with 2 -> 1 Brgds Erik -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Namens Bogdan-Andrei Iancu Verzonden: dinsdag 23 maart 2010 20:42 Aan: OpenSIPS users mailling list Onderwerp: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] diiference between 1.6.1 and 1.6.2 ah....I do not know about he mediaproxy part - maybe somebody from AG projects may answer to your question.... Regards, Bogdan erik pepermans wrote: > Hi Bogdan, > > Sorry - I actually meant there are no mediatrace records in the > media_sessions table of mediaproxy instead of siptrace records in the > sip_trace table of opensips. > > Brgds > Erik > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] Namens Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > Verzonden: dinsdag 23 maart 2010 10:42 > Aan: OpenSIPS users mailling list > Onderwerp: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] diiference between 1.6.1 and 1.6.2 > > > Hi Erik, > > according the logs, the siptrace is inserting some records in the DB > (what you posted is for inserting a reply record). Are you sure you > don't get the data in DB ?? > > Regards, > Bogdan > > erik pepermans wrote: > >> Hi Bogdan, >> >> What I can see is : >> >> Afer invite : >> >> Mar 22 22:38:02 [2889] DBG:siptrace:trace_onreply_out: dest >> [udp:77.xx.xx.xx:5060] Mar 22 22:38:02 [2889] >> DBG:siptrace:trace_onreply_out: storing info... Mar 22 22:38:02 [2889] >> DBG:db_mysql:has_stmt_ctx: ctx found for sip_trace >> >> ... >> >> Mar 22 22:38:02 [2889] DBG:dialog:dlg_onroute: Route param 'did' not >> found >> >> Has the above something to do with it ? >> >> The script itself is fairly simple : >> >> ... >> loadmodule "db_mysql.so" >> loadmodule "signaling.so" >> loadmodule "sl.so" >> loadmodule "tm.so" >> loadmodule "rr.so" >> loadmodule "maxfwd.so" >> loadmodule "usrloc.so" >> loadmodule "registrar.so" >> loadmodule "textops.so" >> loadmodule "mi_fifo.so" >> loadmodule "mi_datagram.so" >> loadmodule "uri.so" >> loadmodule "xlog.so" >> loadmodule "acc.so" >> loadmodule "drouting.so" >> loadmodule "dialog.so" >> loadmodule "aaa_radius.so" >> loadmodule "alias_db.so" >> loadmodule "siptrace.so" >> loadmodule "mediaproxy.so" >> loadmodule "perl.so" >> ... >> # ----- siptrace params ----- >> modparam("siptrace", "db_url", >> "mysql://user:[email protected]/user") modparam("siptrace", >> "trace_flag", 22) modparam("siptrace", "trace_on", 1) >> ... >> ####### Routing Logic ######## >> >> # main request routing logic >> >> route{ >> >> if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { >> sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); >> exit; >> } >> >> force_rport(); >> >> setflag(22); >> ... >> route[1] { >> # for INVITEs enable some additional helper routes >> if (is_method("INVITE")) { >> t_on_branch("2"); >> t_on_reply("2"); >> t_on_failure("1"); >> } >> >> sip_trace(); >> >> >> rewritehostport("77.yy.yy.yy:5060"); >> >> if (!t_relay()) { >> sl_reply_error(); >> }; >> acc_aaa_request("aaa_extra"); >> exit; >> } >> >> Hopes this helps a bit >> >> Brgds >> Erik >> >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] Namens Bogdan-Andrei Iancu >> Verzonden: zondag 21 maart 2010 23:30 >> Aan: OpenSIPS users mailling list >> Onderwerp: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] diiference between 1.6.1 and 1.6.2 >> >> >> Hi Erik, >> >> for the siptrace part,how are you triggering the tracing in the >> script >> ? >> Also, if possible,can you enable debug=6 and post the logs related to >> INVITE siptracing? >> >> Regards, >> Bogdan >> >> erik pepermans wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Using version 1.6.1-notls with mediaproxy module, the increments of >>> KBIn and KBOut in CDRTool work OK; this has stopped in 1.6.2-notls. >>> Moreover the siptrace module doesn't return any record anymore in the >>> siptrace table as of 1.6.2. >>> >>> The opensips.cfg is exactly the same I used in both versions. >>> >>> Brgds >>> Erik >>> >>> -- >>> This message has been scanned for viruses and >>> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, >>> and is believed to be clean. >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> --- >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- Bogdan-Andrei Iancu www.voice-system.ro _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
