Sure: +------+------+-------------------+-------+------------+-------+------------ +----------------+
| gwid | type | address | strip | pri_prefix | attrs | probe_mode | description | +------+------+-------------------+-------+------------+-------+------------ +----------------+ | 1 | 1 | 10.1.1.82 | 0 | | NULL | 0 | Test SIPCORE 1 | | 2 | 1 | 10.1.2.82 | 0 | | NULL | 0 | Test SIPCORE 2 | | 3 | 1 | phonetest.psu.edu | 0 | | NULL | 0 | test | +------+------+-------------------+-------+------------+-------+------------ +----------------+ On 6/2/10 3:11 PM, "Bogdan-Andrei Iancu" <[email protected]> wrote: > In this case, maybe the way the gateway is provisioned in DR table may > skip SRV lookup (like presence of a port). > > Sven, can you post the content of the DR_gateway table? > > Regards, > Bogdan > > Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: >> 2010/6/2 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi Sven, >>> >>> is "phonetest.psu.edu" valid (resolvable) in DNS ? >>> >> >> It is: >> >> $ host phonetest.psu.edu >> phonetest.psu.edu mail is handled by 10 www.et-test.psu.edu. >> >> $ host -t srv _sip._udp.phonetest.psu.edu >> _sip._udp.phonetest.psu.edu has SRV record 10 1 5060 os1.phonetest.psu.edu. >> _sip._udp.phonetest.psu.edu has SRV record 20 1 5060 os2.phonetest.psu.edu. >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
