On 20.10.2010 20:28, Stanisław Pitucha wrote:
On 20/10/10 15:08, Victor Gamov wrote:Ca somebody explain me which result expected when loose_route() called by X.X.X.X for request like following:----- ACK sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0. Record-Route:<sip:X.X.X.X;lr=on> To:<sip:[email protected]>;tag=4ded008d6ca9692485d1918f60c7da12 ----- I hope that (as RFC3261 says at 16.12): -- topmost (and single) Route removed (this route node has been reached)No "Route:" header is removed. There are no route headers in this packet.
Oops! Sorry for my mistake. Original packet is: ------- ACK sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0. Route:<sip:X.X.X.X;lr=on> To:<sip:[email protected]>;tag=4ded008d6ca9692485d1918f60c7da12 ------- -- CU, Victor Gamov
<<attachment: vit.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
