I would rather say:
1) make opensips to insert in the time_stamp col the time when the message was received and not the time when the insertion in done (this will preserve the order of the packages)

2) probably a time stamp (sec only) is not eough and some microsecs needs to be added..(to order packages in the same sec).

What do you thing?

Regards,
Bogdan


MohammedShehzad wrote:
I added a field microsec in database and a little change in the
CDRTool - instead of ordering siptrace by id, it order by time_stamp
and microsec. Though the trick did not worked. This changes were done
in siptrace module.
May be it could have worked if the time_stamp and microsec is being
picked up from original location where function of the siptrace module
is being called. As It requires modification in one level up (may be
include multiple other db and sip messages related modules) I thought
it would leave the code unstable. So currently not looking into code
more yet. Would like to check if get more insight.

Regards,
MohammedShehzad


What is the idea you are trying to hack ? maybe to brains are better
than one ;)

Regards,
Bogdan

MohammedShehzad wrote:

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:53 AM, MohammedShehzad <pmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Bogdan,

Thanks for your prompt response. I was hacking into the code of
siptrace module but no success yet. Anyway something is better than
nothing.

Regards,
MohammedShehzad


Hi Mohammed,

This is more or less a limitation ; as opensips is doing parallel
processing , you may have concurrent DB access (like inserting the
siptrace record for 200OK and the one for ACK)...Also the DB ops
(requiring locks) may change the sequence of the ops ( the order of the
queries and the order of the actual db ops).

There is no way to guarantee the order of the package in DB.

Regards,
Bogdan

MohammedShehzad wrote:
Hello everybody,

I am facing an issue in sip message sequence while I log the siptrace
using siptrace module.
The issue is random, means, generally it is fine, but sometimes the
SIP messages are out of sequence i.e. ACK get logged before 200OK,
even sometimes INVITE comes after 100 Trying or 180 ringing.

I found that, when CDRTool list siptrace of call, the SIP messages are
ordered by ID, which is auto increment field. So it seems that the
siptraces are not being inserted properly in sequence from siptrace
module itself.
My Opensips Version : opensips-1.5.3-notls
MySQL database is used, and is on remote system.

Is there anything I should try to resolve this issue? Or is this
bug/limitation of siptrace module itself?
Regards,
MohammedShehzad

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



--
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Bootcamp
15 - 19 November 2010, Edison, New Jersey, USA
www.voice-system.ro


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to