Hi Anton,
Nothing is perfect :) . Again, as sequential requests has the path and
endpoint pre-determined, there is no need for routing, so need for
failure route.
This is not a SIP based statement , but a logical one.
Regards,
Bogdan
On 04/08/2011 01:06 PM, Anton Zagorskiy wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
thanks for answer and link.
I asked because of while re-reading Flavio Goncalves's book (OpenSIPS 1.6)
I've found that he handle failure route on RE-INVITE and thus his scripts
aren't correct sometimes.
WBR, Anton Zagorskiy
VoIP Developer, Oyster Telecom
Phone.: +7 812 601-0666
Fax: +7 812 601-0593
[email protected]
www.oyster-telecom.ru
-----Original Message-----
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 8:36 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Cc: Anton Zagorskiy
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] re-invite in failure route
Hi Anton,
On 04/07/2011 03:51 PM, Anton Zagorskiy wrote:
Hi.
Does it needed to handle RE-INVITE by failure_route?
normally no. Sequential requests are routed based on route set (Route
hdr) and no failure_route (re-routing) is required.
We can't use drouting module and we shouldn't redirect a RE-INVITE to
media services.
Again, you do not have to do script routing for re-INVITEs (they are part
of an
existing dialog, so they know the path to get from A to B, no need for a
explicit routing) - just use the "loose_route" function for sequential
requests.
Better check http://www.opensips.org/Resources/Webinars#toc11
What we can do with RE-INVITE in the failure_route?
Regards,
Bogdan
--
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS eBootcamp - 2nd of May 2011
OpenSIPS solutions and "know-how"
--
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS eBootcamp - 2nd of May 2011
OpenSIPS solutions and "know-how"
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
