Hi Alejandro,
The "fix" you have there does not make too much sense....as t_relay()
does internally a t_newtran() :)....
Another thing is that opensips does not generate a 491 by
itself....probably it generate by an upstream party...
Do you have a SIP capture from opensips machine, showing both inbound
and outbound traffic?
Regards,
Bogdan
On 04/19/2011 02:50 AM, Alejandro Rios P. wrote:
Hi all
OpenSIPs seems to be sending a 491 Request Pending when a lot of
RE-INVITES are received.
I found out the following threads regarding this problem:
http://opensips.org/pipermail/users/2010-May/012724.html
http://www.mentby.com/Group/opensips-users/re-invite-problem-gt-491-request-pending.html
So, it seems that I could get rid of that error by adding a
t_newtran() before t_relay() when I handle an ACK:
http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.6.2/tm.html#id294024
Like this:
/ if ( is_method("ACK") ) {/
/ if ( t_check_trans() ) {/
/ # non loose-route, but stateful ACK; must be
an ACK after a 487 or e.g. 404 from upstream server/
/t_newtran();/
/ t_relay();/
/ exit;/
/ } else {/
/ # ACK without matching transaction ... ignore
and discard.\n");/
/ xlog("L_WARN", "[$mi] discarding ACK\n");/
/ exit;/
/ };/
/ };/
But I'm not sure if this is correct. I'd appreciate any comments to
see if I missed something before testing live.
Thank you and best regards,
Alejandro Rios Peña
DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed are my own, and not necessarily
those of my employer.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS eBootcamp - 2nd of May 2011
OpenSIPS solutions and "know-how"
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
