Not sure if it is an issue or not. When I test with Jitsi or Bria client they respond to the OPTIONS message with a 200 OK. I will post this on the Blink mailing list and see what they have to say. Thanks for the help and fixing the issue.

On Jul 14, 2011 10:18am, Duane Larson <[email protected]> wrote:
I thought that might be the issue. I will look into what I am doing.



On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Vlad Paiu [email protected]> wrote:




Hello,

Glad to see that it has worked.

I see that the To and From headers are different in the generated pings, sip:[email protected] vs sip:[email protected] .


Are you using uac_replace_to/uac_replace_from to mangled the To and From headers, or how are you manipulating the headers ?




Regards,
--

Vlad Paiu

OpenSIPS Developer









On 07/14/2011 06:01 PM, Duane Larson wrote:



That fix did fix my issue. This is what I am seeing now and I am guessing this could be an issue. Figure it might have something to do with the fact that I change the To: and From: headers maybe?





U 2011/07/14 09:55:01.570108 173.XXX.XXX.107:5060 -> 64.132.245.122:15073
OPTIONS sip:[email protected]:15073 SIP/2.0.


Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.XXX.XXX.107;branch=z9hG4bK40f.8ea107f4.0.
To: sip:[email protected]>;tag=6mZ.hX2A2HzZ2j99ttSvNxStBLVnzI4n.
From: sip:[email protected]>;tag=f55753a702964d54babd04143f8f831d.


CSeq: 1 OPTIONS.
Call-ID: AZ9B9EO4ZJo58X9UyZWv-pzeD7nyQaiM.
Content-Length: 0.
User-Agent: OpenSIPS (1.8.0-dev0-notls (x86_64/linux)).
.


#
U 2011/07/14 09:55:01.570159 173.XXX.XXX.107:5060 -> 64.132.245.122:15052
OPTIONS sip:[email protected]:15052 SIP/2.0.


Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.XXX.XXX.107;branch=z9hG4bKc3b7.c0c22472.0.
To: sip:[email protected]>;tag=f55753a702964d54babd04143f8f831d.
From: sip:[email protected]>;tag=6mZ.hX2A2HzZ2j99ttSvNxStBLVnzI4n.


CSeq: 31012 OPTIONS.
Call-ID: AZ9B9EO4ZJo58X9UyZWv-pzeD7nyQaiM.
Content-Length: 0.
User-Agent: OpenSIPS (1.8.0-dev0-notls (x86_64/linux)).
.


#
U 2011/07/14 09:55:01.604366 64.132.245.122:15073 -> 173.XXX.XXX.107:5060
SIP/2.0 500 Unhandled by dialog usages.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.XXX.XXX.107;received=173.XXX.XXX.107;branch=z9hG4bK40f.8ea107f4.0.


Call-ID: AZ9B9EO4ZJo58X9UyZWv-pzeD7nyQaiM.
From: sip:[email protected]>;tag=f55753a702964d54babd04143f8f831d.
To: sip:[email protected]>;tag=6mZ.hX2A2HzZ2j99ttSvNxStBLVnzI4n.


CSeq: 1 OPTIONS.
Server: Blink 0.24.1 (MacOSX).
Content-Length: 0.
.


#
U 2011/07/14 09:55:01.607154 64.132.245.122:15052 -> 173.XXX.XXX.107:5060
SIP/2.0 500 Unhandled by dialog usages.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 173.XXX.XXX.107;received=173.XXX.XXX.107;branch=z9hG4bKc3b7.c0c22472.0.


Call-ID: AZ9B9EO4ZJo58X9UyZWv-pzeD7nyQaiM.
From: sip:[email protected]>;tag=6mZ.hX2A2HzZ2j99ttSvNxStBLVnzI4n.
To: sip:[email protected]>;tag=f55753a702964d54babd04143f8f831d.


CSeq: 31012 OPTIONS.
Server: Blink 0.2.7 (Windows).
Content-Length: 0.








On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Vlad Paiu [email protected]> wrote:




Hello Brett,

In 1.6.x the dialog could have also been created by setting a flag from the script, but this was dropped in 1.7.0.

Quite a few modules used the Dialog internal API to create dialogs on their own, like trace_dialog() in Siptrace, engage_rtp_proxy() in RTPProxy, or even the ACC module when generating CDRs.



The latest commit should fix all of these issues, where the dialog was created internally by a function called from the script, and pinging or automatic timeout would have been skipped.




Regards,
--

Vlad Paiu

OpenSIPS Developer






On 07/14/2011 05:43 PM, Brett Nemeroff wrote:









On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Vlad Paiu [email protected]> wrote:




Hello Duane,

Just took a look at your config.
What was happening is that you were first calling trace_dialog(), which creates the dialog structure internally. When the call to create_dialog("PpB") came later on, it already found that the dialog was created and did not set the needed flags for pinging.







Nice catch here...

Are there any other "automatic dialog creation" methods that might interfere with the dialog creation flags being set?

-Brett







_______________________________________________

Users mailing list

[email protected]

http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users






_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users






--
--
*--*--*--*--*--*
Duane
*--*--*--*--*--*
--


_______________________________________________

Users mailing list

[email protected]

http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users







_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users






--
--
*--*--*--*--*--*
Duane
*--*--*--*--*--*
--



_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to