Hi Duane,
your logs do not cover the most important part - the first
"next_branches"... Could you repost ?
Regards,
Bogdan
On 07/15/2011 03:43 AM, Duane Larson wrote:
I have a scenario where there are three numbers that need to be called
90127X2XX9 should get called first || Q-value is 90
90148X7XX9 should get called second || Q-value is 50
90133X9XX9 should get called last || Q-Value is 40
The issue i am seeing is that the first and second number are getting
called in parrallel and then the third number gets called last. I
have debug the issue with level 6. I'm not able to paste the debug to
pastebin because it is too big. So here is a a shortened version.
Hopefully the relevant stuff
http://pastebin.com/D8NK50X9
Just for something to compare I have the second scenario where the Q
Value works properly without issue
90127X2XX9 gets called first || Q-Value is 90
90133X9XX9 gets called second || Q-Value is 70
90148X7XX9 gets called last || Q-Value is 50
With this each call is called serially in the order that they should.
I also have a debug for this but I also can't paste this to pastebin.
Here is the relevant stuff
http://pastebin.com/vRiLiRw9
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS eBootcamp - 19th of September 2011
OpenSIPS solutions and "know-how"
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
