I can't tell any significant difference for just asterisk load balancing. Both will be performing at par. No difference at all except the configuration code.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Nick Khamis <[email protected]> wrote: > Shlonak Faisal, > > I saw that you worked on load balancing your * box. We are currently > looking to do the same. Any reason you > selected OpenSIP vs. Kamailio? > > Thanks in Advnace, > > Ninus. > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Faisal Rehman > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I want to test the Performance of Load Balancing with the help of sipP in > > which I have been un-successful yet. But I want to simply pass the calls > > from OpenSIPS to the Free-Switch which are running on different ports. > Let > > say OpenSIPS is running on 5161 and FS on 3141 on the same server using > the > > below command: > > ./sipp -sn uac 64.156.193.193:5161 > > & in result I am getting 404 Not Found every time. Is there any mistake > in > > the above command or I can't test both OpenSIPS & FS on the same server? > > > > > > With Best Regards, > > > > Faisal Rehman > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
