Hi, On Oct 19, 2011, at 7:16 PM, JimDoesVoip wrote:
> Hi Saúl, > > Thanks for the detailed reply. Perhaps only to get the idea of running more > than one media relay /server out of my system: > > Is there any reason (performance gain / resiliency / other?) to run 2 > different instances of media-relay on an individual server, each connecting > to different/independent dispatchers? I assume the two relay processes here > could share a single IP because they aren't connecting to the same > dispatcher? > No, there is no reason to do that unless you'd want different IP addresses for relaying the traffic. A single relay may connect to any amount of dispatchers, so, for resilience, you can make those 2 relays connect simultaneously to the 2 dispatchers. > Sad to say that I'm disappointed that I won't be using those extra cores :) > Perhaps it speaks to the elegance of the mediaproxy implementation. > Actually I think you will. We pass the control to the Linux kernel, so it's up to her to sue those cores. It's an iptables thing, so I guess it uses multiple cores, but I can't say with 100% certainty. Regards, -- Saúl Ibarra Corretgé AG Projects _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
