I am having the following issue
Jitsi phone user 9016XX6XX4 is configured with Presence to monitor
9013XX3XX6 Snom Phone. I used Soap-Simple-Proxy to set up XCAP rules so
that both users have permissions to view each others presence. Because I
used Soap-Simple-Proxy to create rules everything works fine. Here is what
is in XCAP
| 1555 | 9013XX3XX6 | irock.com | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ruleset xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:common-policy"
xmlns:pr="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pres-rules"
xmlns:cp="www.counterpath.com/privacy-lists"><rule
id="pres_whitelist"><conditions><identity><one
id="sip:[email protected]"/></identity></conditions><actions><pr:sub-handling>allow</pr:sub-handling></actions>
<transformations>
<pr:provide-services>
<pr:all-services/>
</pr:provide-services>
<pr:provide-persons>
<pr:all-persons/>
</pr:provide-persons>
<pr:provide-devices>
<pr:all-devices/>
</pr:provide-devices>
<pr:provide-all-attributes/>
</transformations></rule></ruleset> | 2 | 1def73bc3d7e509b840d5d96292e12c7
| 0 | index.xml | 0 |
| 1554 | 9016XX6XX4 | irock.com | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ruleset xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:common-policy"
xmlns:pr="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pres-rules"
xmlns:cp="www.counterpath.com/privacy-lists"><rule
id="pres_whitelist"><conditions><identity><one
id="sip:[email protected]"/><one
id="sip:[email protected]"/></identity></conditions><actions><pr:sub-handling>allow</pr:sub-handling></actions>
<transformations>
<pr:provide-services>
<pr:all-services/>
</pr:provide-services>
<pr:provide-persons>
<pr:all-persons/>
</pr:provide-persons>
<pr:provide-devices>
<pr:all-devices/>
</pr:provide-devices>
<pr:provide-all-attributes/>
</transformations></rule></ruleset> | 2 | 23318e100042f0084231b010d44eb00f
| 0 | index.xml | 0 |
So here is the issue I see.....
Yesterday I had a Jitsi phone user 9016XX6X54 add a buddy (9016XX6XX4). So
this time I didn't create the permission rules for user 9016XX6X54 with
Soap-Simple-Proxy but instead let the Jitsi client create the rules and PUT
the rules in the XCAP server. When 9016XX6X54 makes a call the 9016XX6XX4
user doesn't see that he is making a call. The same thing happens if
9016XX6XX4 makes a call, 9016XX6X54 doesn't see that the other user is not
on the phone. I see that they NOTIFY messages are being sent to the Jitsi
client and the client replies back with 200 OK but the Jitsi client doesn't
change the users icon to show they are being called or on the phone.
Here is the XCAP entry that the Jitsi client created
| 1559 | 9016XX6X54 | irock.com | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"
standalone="no"?><ruleset
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:common-policy"><rule
id="pres_whitelist"><conditions><identity><one
id="sip:[email protected]"/><one
id="sip:[email protected]"/></identity></conditions><actions><sub-handling
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pres-rules">allow</sub-handling></actions><transformations><provide-devices
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pres-rules"><all-devices/></provide-devices><provide-persons
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pres-rules"><all-persons/></provide-persons><provide-services
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pres-rules"><all-services/></provide-services><pr:provide-all-attributes
xmlns:pr="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pres-rules"/></transformations></rule></ruleset>
| 2 | 28f8580993ab4502aa0565605c055907 | 0 | index.xml | 0 |
So obviously there are a lot of differences between the entry that
Soap-Simple-Proxy created and what the Jitsi client created (like in the
Jitsi ruleset it only has "common-policy" and not "pres-rules"). So I am
thinking that Jitsi's schema is missing some stuff. Would I be correct in
my thinking?
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
