Hi, On May 29, 2012, at 2:47 PM, Rudy wrote:
> Saul, > > The new behavior would indeed be desirable in cases such as enum. Another > solution might be to add an optional parameter to add_diversion for using the > newly rewritten ruri. This may work more fluidly with older code that relies > on the current behavior. > Indeed, this, could be another choice. To summarize: 1. Modify add_diversion to get the most current RURI 2. Add an AVP which if set is used instead of the original RURI 3. Add a new parameter to add_diversion, with the URI to be used instead of the original RURI Thanks for the feedback Rudy! -- Saúl Ibarra Corretgé AG Projects _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
