Hello, > Is this intentional? My location database is indexed with username and > domain, and I doubt I should change that. What I had expected was a > list of registrations to be maintained. Am I wrong to assume that?
I found evidence that multiple entries under one key are supported by BerkeleyDB itself, http://doc.gnu-darwin.org/am_conf/dup.html I did not find the flag DB_DUP in the 1.8.0 sources though. Nor a hint of it in the metadata. Also, the DB_NEXT_DUP flag to DB->c_get() is not used in the module source code. My question stands -- was this intended to be used, am I missing something? Thanks, -Rick _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
