This is driving me crazy. I was right the first time when I said that one of the ACKs was not showing up as a loose route. It is the third ACK that is coming from the OpenSIPS/Proxy. When it reaches the OpenSIPS/SBC device the ACK fails as a loose route.
It would make sense that this would not be a loose route because there are no Route headers so the loose_route() function would return FALSE. The issue still remains that when the ACK reaches the OpenSIPS/SBC it still isn't routed to the Callee, instead it is looped and routed to the same interface it came from because that is whats in the RURI. -- View this message in context: http://opensips-open-sip-server.1449251.n2.nabble.com/Two-OpenSIPS-proxies-issue-tp7580685p7580743.html Sent from the OpenSIPS - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
