Duane, I read through your post yesterday twice. It didn't sound like to me it had been resolved...I'll re-re-read it again this afternoon!
- Jeff On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:11 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Jeff, > > Read my post. I got my calls working but I am not sure if it was a bug or > something is just jacked up with my config and I am not following the RFCs > the right way. I can go into more detail offline if you need. I hope to get > some feedback on my post. > > On , Jeff Pyle <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Duane, > > > > I have captures now! I also read through your thread. The situation > looks to be the same. I also have a missing username in the self-relayed > ACK's RURI. > > > > > > And it's also driving my crazy. > > > > > > > > > > I'm on 1.7 build 9142. You? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Jeff > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 7:14 PM, [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Almost sounds like you and I are having the same issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's my issue > > > > > > > http://opensips-open-sip-server.1449251.n2.nabble.com/Two-OpenSIPS-proxies-issue-td7580685.html > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have a SIP trace? I'm just wondering if we are having the same > problem. Does the ACK that gets relayed to ifself on the other IP have the > username missing in the RURI? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On , Jeff Pyle [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm attempting to write a config to perform near-end NAT traversal on > Opensips 1.7. I'm having a problem with the loose_route of the ACK after > the 200 OK, and if I wait long enough, the BYE as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's the scenario. An INVITE comes in the WAN side and is t_relay'd > to the LAN side. The LAN-side UAS sends a 200 OK, and that is relayed back > to the WAN-side UAC. So far, so good. Then the WAN-side UAC sends the ACK > to the 200. Opensips relays this from its own WAN IP to its own LAN IP - I > found it with ngrep on the lo interface. Eventually Opensips sends a 408 > back to the UAC. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's the relevant portion of the config, based largely on the > included sample. This works fine with single-interface configurations: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (has_totag()) { > > > > > > > if (loose_route()) { > > > > > > > if (method=="INVITE") record_route(); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (!t_relay()) sl_reply_error(); > > > > > > > exit; > > > > > > > } else { > > > > > > > if (method == "ACK") { > > > > > > > if (t_check_trans()) { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (!t_relay()) > sl_reply_error(); > > > > > > > exit; > > > > > > > } else { > > > > > > > exit; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > sl_send_reply("404", "Not Here"); > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > exit; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've verified with xlogs the ACK hits in the loose_route() portion of > the config. It does hit t_relay, but it relays the message to itself on > its 'other' IP. I've tried to look the extended debugs but I'm not finding > anything telling. Unfortunately I don't have any experience with multiple > interface configurations. I suspect it has something to do with the double > Via lines added, one from each interface. Perhaps it's not detecting the > second Via as its own? (Even if that were the case, I can't explain why > it's not responding to itself on the lo interface.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do have mhomed=1 enabled. Without it the initial invite doesn't > arrive at the LAN-side UAS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've experimented with check_via, aliases, etc. No effect. Any > suggestions on where to go from here? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Jeff > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Users mailing list > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
