Hi Bogdan-Andrei, Thank you for your response. Yes I confirm in INVITE I have 2 RR with lr=on:
<sip:8.8.8.8;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4> <sip:8.8.8.9;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4> and in 200OK I have 1 RR with just lr: <sip:8.8.8.8;lr;r2=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>,<sip:8.8.8.9;lr;r2=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4> and in ACK I have 2 Route with lr: <sip:8.8.8.8;lr;r2=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4> <sip:8.8.8.9;lr;r2=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4> > Hi Mickael, > > Can you confirm (for the failed call) that OpenSIPS added in INVITE RR > hdrs with "lr=on" param and in the 200 OK or ACK you get only "lr" param > (with no value) ? > > Regards, > > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > OpenSIPS Founder and Developer > http://www.opensips-solutions.com > > > On 08/24/2012 11:09 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> Hi list, >> I have a routing problem with my Opensips >> version: opensips 1.6.4-2-tls (i386/freebsd) >> >> Indeed Opensips is unable to route ACK packet to final destination (look >> attachement .txt). >> >> The only difference with a normal call (Call OK), it's Record-Route >> formating. Customer's device send 200OK with differents fields: >> >> >> Test device with the problem (call NOT OK): >> Ex: problem call = 1 field for 2 routes >> Extract from the customer 200OK >> >> Record-Route: >> <sip:8.8.8.8;lr;r2=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4>,<sip:9.9.9.9;lr;r2=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4> >> >> >> Test with another device (call OK) >> Ex: normal call = 2 fields for 2 routes >> Extract from the Customer 200OK >> >> Record-Route: >> <sip:8.8.8.8;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4> >> Record-Route: >> <sip:9.9.9.9;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=c97942d9-13c4-50237efd-8d49d7d0-5fb68102;xyz=3a2.86da31c4> >> >> My question is: This opensips version is able to work with 1 >> record-route >> field containing 2 informations ? >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> regards >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
