On Nov 1, 2012, at 11:38 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > Hi Inaki, > > Please correct me if I'm wrong, but reading the draft and listing you guys > all, I would say the right approach is to : (1) use OverSIP as gw (to extract > SIP traffic from WebSocket) and (2) make OpenSIPS to support SIP traffic > resulted from websocket extraction. > > If so, OpenSIPS has nothing to do with the WebSocket protocol itself, but > only to support the extensions from the draft (like new protocols and > eventually the SIP server location). >
Hi Bogdan, Assuming we go with 1), I think just by adding support for point 5.2.1 and 5.2.2 (from the draft) to OpenSIPS would suffice. The rest would be taken care of by the OverSIP server, which would have acted a s a edge proxy with Path, for example. Regards, -- Saúl Ibarra Corretgé AG Projects _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
