yes. Regards, Qasim
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]>wrote: > ** > And do you have UDP 202.152.203.195 port 6000 as listener defined in > OpenSIPS ?? > > Regards, > > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com > > > On 05/16/2013 12:32 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi Bodgan, > > Yes i see the following route header in my packet. > > Route: > <sip:[email protected]:6000;lr;ftag=3b710c25;did=e55.a77ff685> > > > And yes i am routing it through loose_route. > > Regards, > Qasim > > > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Hello Qasim, >> >> The ACK should be routed via loose_route() based on the "Route" headers >> from it. Could you check if the Route hdrs (from the ACK) are correctly >> reflecting your opensips interfaces ? >> >> Best regards, >> >> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu >> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com >> >> >> On 05/14/2013 07:55 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I am using OpenSIPs in Public<->Private bridging mode and have enabled >> mhomed=1. But the problem is that when we have a call in which both parties >> are on Public interface the INVITE gets relayed properly but and ACK of >> that invite gives the following error. >> >> ERROR:core:get_out_socket: no socket found >> ERROR:core:forward_request: cannot forward to af 2, proto 1 no >> correspondinglistening socket >> >> Regards, >> Qasim >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing >> [email protected]http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
