+1

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com


On 08/13/2013 02:19 PM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Aug 13, 2013, at 12:56 PM, Răzvan Crainea wrote:
>
>> Hello all!
>>
>> As some of you might have already noticed, the old SVN repository (hosted by 
>> SourceForge) does not contain the 1.10 branch yet. The reason for not 
>> creating it yet is because we would like to argue a bit about it's necessity.
>>
>> The main reason we are still maintaining the old SVN branches synchronized 
>> with GIT is for old checkouts to still be able to update their sources. 
>> However, this is not the case of OpenSIPS 1.10, since all the new checkouts 
>> should be done directly from the GIT repository.
>>
>> A different reason is that we are using a few scripts for automatically 
>> generate documentation, db schemas, debs and so on and so forth. Most of 
>> these scripts rely on the old SVN repository to make sure they always use 
>> the latest version of the sources. However we think it is worth investing 
>> time in porting them to GIT, since at a certain point we would like to 
>> completely get rid of the SVN repository. And probably it is a good idea to 
>> start now!
>>
> YES!
>
>> So basically my question is: do you think we should still invest effort in 
>> creating and maintaining the 1.10 SVN branch on the old repository? Or you 
>> would rather migrate your deployments to a GIT based repository?
>>
> I don't think you guys should waste time in having a subversion branch. We 
> use git now, subversion is in the past!
>
> Also, for those with nostalgia, this actually works:
>
> svn checkout https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
> AG Projects
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to