Unfortunately this is par for the course when dealing with 3rd party interconnects.
Some will adhere to the RFC beautifully, and others (often large multi-national telcos) will have their own interpretation of the RFC that you find they require. The best advice I can give here is to have a testing phase (even if only a few calls) - so you can compare your respective understandings of costs and CDRs before going fully live with a carrier. Pete http://www.voxbeam.com On 10 December 2013 20:47, Nick Cameo <[email protected]> wrote: > Just did a text using uac_replace_to, and appended the prefix to the > TO Header, and now the calls are going through. What kind of chemistry > project is this? How many RFC standards are we breaking? Is there > anyway to do this for just this service provider's (gateway + prefix) > without hacking my beautifully scripted opensips file. > > Feature request? DB flag for adding prefix to the TO Header? > > Kind Regards, > > Nick. > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
