This would be a pretty cool feature and I know that OpenSIPS guys have discussed such a feature with FreeSWITCH dev. This would be a great addition for load balancing.
Adding OpenSIPS user mailing list. Regards, Ali Pey On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Karsten Horsmann <[email protected]>wrote: > Hello List, > > i read too the nice > http://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Enterprise_deploymentEnterprise Deployment > Setups. > Personaly i run FS 1.2.x as Session Border Controller where sip clients > could register and internal (3rd party) IVRs could reachs the clients. > > I plan to use DNS SRV on the to scale up the FS Servers and have fault > talerance. > > For that i have to diffrent uplinks that i could use for the DNS SRV > Records and AFAIK i could use track-calls=true in sofia profiles > to track the right incoming/outgoing profile. > > The only thing i missed is that my 3rd party IVRs used FS as outbound > proxy and therefore only one IP is spezified on the internal network. > > With an virtual IP on the FS side i could solve that but then the FS > servers is IMHO limited to be a active/passiv duo. > > Any ideas how to handle that? > > > > 2014-02-17 2:45 GMT+01:00 jay binks <[email protected]>: > >> So I want to bash out a feature I was thinking of, please can anyone >> chime in some ideas on this. >> >> So its easy to have OpenSIP / Kamailio ( dispatcher ) send SIP Options to >> FS to see if its responding .. this is great ... >> >> My request would be to have some kind of control over the response FS >> Sends back. >> What I would love is to respond with idle CPU , current SPS / Max SPS or >> channels / Max Channels. >> >> This is only a high level "this would be nice" , so I havnt totally >> thought this through but... >> we would have to provide an ACL for who to provide this back to, coz I >> wouldnt really want any old guy on the internet sending me options and me >> respond going ... oh yea bro, Im at 90% ... dont have to try hard to DDOS >> Me.. :) >> >> but yea... if we could give this back to the load balancers, then we >> could easily instruct them to back traffic off to this gateway. >> >> the next part is , how do you back off the traffic. >> one option is to have FS respond differently if any of these are close to >> thresholds. >> or to provide these values in custom headers, but that would require >> changes in dispatcher ( which is ok I Guess ) >> >> anyways... I wanted some input on peoples thoughts here.. >> let me know what you think. >> >> >> Jay >> >> _________________________________________________________________________ >> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: >> [email protected] >> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com >> >> FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server >> http://www.cudatel.com >> >> Official FreeSWITCH Sites >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> http://wiki.freeswitch.org >> http://www.cluecon.com >> >> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users >> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users >> http://www.freeswitch.org >> >> > > > -- > Mit freundlichen Grüßen > *Karsten Horsmann* > > _________________________________________________________________________ > Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: > [email protected] > http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com > > FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server > http://www.cudatel.com > > Official FreeSWITCH Sites > http://www.freeswitch.org > http://wiki.freeswitch.org > http://www.cluecon.com > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users > UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users > http://www.freeswitch.org > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
