You mean 5061? The packets are encrypted, i will try to capture them with ngrep and decrypt with the private key using wireshark and post the decrypted data to gist.
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Eric Tamme <[email protected]> Date: 2015-02-14 3:47 GMT+02:00 Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips + RtpProxy: media stream timed out while starting To: OpenSIPS users mailling list <[email protected]> The message about late back means it is probably not routing. Install ngrep and run ngrep -qtd any -W byline port 5060 On OpenSIPS during the call. Paste the output to a gist on gist.github.com and include the link in your next reply. -Eric On Feb 13, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Semen Golubcov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello. Should i answer you here or send my replies to the user list? > > I looked up the sip trace and syslog, apparently there are no > retransmissions i think and there is no messages about "no matching > transaction exists". > > Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]: > DBG:core:parse_msg: method: <ACK> > Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]: > DBG:core:parse_msg: uri: <sip:[email protected](my_Public_ip > (client) ):49190;transport=tls> > Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]: > DBG:core:parse_msg: version: <SIP/2.0> > Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]: > DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=2 > Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]: > DBG:core:parse_via_param: found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=6 > Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]: > DBG:core:parse_via_param: found param type 232, <branch> = > <z9hG4bKPjb29aaf78cf594541aeb97e0b801a4075>; state=6 > Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]: > DBG:core:parse_via_param: found param type 237, <alias> = <n/a>; state=16 > Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]: > DBG:core:parse_via: end of header reached, state=5 > Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]: > DBG:core:parse_headers: via found, flags=2 > Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]: > DBG:core:parse_headers: this is the first via > Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]: > DBG:core:receive_msg: After parse_msg... > Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]: > DBG:core:receive_msg: preparing to run routing scripts... > Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]: > DBG:sl:sl_filter_ACK: to late to be a local ACK! > > In this example i was calling calling from one user to another on my > machine (so the ip will always be the same for both clients). I guess here: > Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]: > DBG:core:parse_msg: method: <ACK> > Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]: > DBG:core:parse_msg: uri: <sip:[email protected](my_Public_ip > (client) ):49190;transport=tls> > Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]: > DBG:core:parse_msg: version: <SIP/2.0> > Feb 14 01:19:43 martin /usr/local/sbin/opensips[14061]: > DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=2 > > The server get's the ack from my client, and than opensips says: > > "Apr 5 23:06:22 ser /usr/local/sbin/ser[6282]: DEBUG : sl_filter_ACK: to > late to be a local ACK!" > > Does this mean that ACK is getting lost? I'll attach the syslog just in > case. > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
