Yes, it resolves to itself. The domain is the one from OpenSIPS domains
table.
And this is actually what I want. I want OpenSIPS to find the contact from
its locations table using function lookup("locations");And it works, OpenSIPS finds contact IP and sends NOTIFY to the phone. The only thing is that the packet has 2 Via headers with the same IP and port of OpenSIPS server. As I said, it works, but looks weird. On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Newlin, Ben <[email protected]> wrote: > It sounds like you may be sending the NOTIFY to yourself when you use > the domain name instead of the IP. Have you verified the address that the > domain resolves to? Is it the same as the OpenSIPS instance? > > Ben Newlin > > From: Stas Kobzar > Reply-To: OpenSIPS users mailling list > Date: Wednesday, June 3, 2015 at 6:00 PM > To: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > Cc: OpenSIPS users mailling list > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Double via in MI generated NOTIFY > > Hi Bogdan, > > No, I do not use local_route at all. > > My code for these kind of notifies is in the beginning of the initial > part or main route after t_check_trans and looks like this: > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > t_check_trans(); > > # RFC3265: NOTIFY can not be outside SIP dialog. > # So we should drop the packet > if(is_method("NOTIFY")) { > # There is an exception: if this is a check-sync packet > # for phone configuration reload request > if($hdr(Event) =~ "check-sync"){ > lookup("locations", "m"); > xlog("L_INFO", "$ci|$rm| Send reboot request notify packet to > destination $ru"); > t_relay(); > exit(); > } > send_reply("481","Dialog does not exists"); > exit; > } > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I have tried different scenarios: > - Put this code before t_check_trans > - do not use lookup function > - replaced t_relay with forward > > Nothing helped. > > However, when I run fifo command using IP address in sip URI, like this: > opensipsctl fifo t_uac_dlg NOTIFY sip:[email protected] . . '"From: < > sip:[email protected]>;tag=8755a8d01aa27e903a6f4ccaf393f04\r\nTo: < > sip:[email protected]>\r\nEvent: check-sync\r\n"' > > then, the packet seems to send directly from local_route. Because, in this > case, I do not even see it in the logs. > > Thank you! > Stas > > > > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Stas, >> >> Do you do any local_route stuff ? If yes, do you modify the RURI/DURI or >> other parts of the requests? >> >> Regards, >> >> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu >> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com >> >> On 01.06.2015 17:42, Stas Kobzar wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I am sending NOTIFY packet with event "check-sync" to reload phone >> configuration. >> >> I am doing it with opensips FIFO mi. >> >> My command looks like this: >> opensipsctl fifo t_uac_dlg NOTIFY sip:[email protected] . . '"From: < >> sip:[email protected]>;tag=8755a8d01aa27e903a6f4ccaf393f04\r\nTo: < >> sip:[email protected]>\r\nEvent: check-sync\r\n"' >> >> When I use IP address in RURI (sip:[email protected]) it works as >> expected. >> >> However, when I use domain name in RURI (like this: >> sip:[email protected]) and my command looks like this: >> opensipsctl fifo t_uac_dlg NOTIFY sip:[email protected] . . >> '"From: <sip:[email protected]>;tag=8755a8d01aa27e903a6f4ccaf393f04\r\nTo: >> <sip:[email protected]>\r\nEvent: check-sync\r\n"' >> >> I have two Via headers in my resulting NOTIFY packet with different >> branche tags: >> >> NOTIFY sip:[email protected] SIP/2.0. >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.130.8.20:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0872.598957f2.0. >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.130.8.20:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0872.498957f2.0. >> To: sip:[email protected]. >> From: <sip:[email protected] >> >;tag=734c62bd59eb9f33d3e6313898450dd1. >> CSeq: 10 NOTIFY. >> Call-ID: [email protected]. >> Max-Forwards: 69. >> Content-Length: 0. >> Server: ETS voip router01. >> Event: check-sync >> . >> >> >> In first case, I do not even see the packet in main route but I see it >> in local_route. >> >> In my second case I see it in main route but the packet is sent with >> double Via header. >> >> I am sure it is not my routing script, because I have just put a >> forward to some IP whenever NOTIFY is received and I still have this >> problem. >> >> Is it a known issue? >> >> Everything still works fine, but having a double Via in logs a bit >> confusing. >> >> Thank you, >> -- >> >> Stas Kobzar >> >> Developeur VoIP / VoIP Developer >> >> ___________________ >> >> Modulis.ca Inc. >> >> # Bureau / Office: 514-284-2020 x 246 >> >> Email: s <http://firstname.lastname>[email protected] >> >> https://www.modulis.com >> >> <https://www.modulis.com/es-url-001> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing >> [email protected]http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >> > > > -- > > Stas Kobzar > > Developeur VoIP / VoIP Developer > > ___________________ > > Modulis.ca Inc. > > # Bureau / Office: 514-284-2020 x 246 > > Email: s <http://firstname.lastname>[email protected] > > https://www.modulis.com > > <https://www.modulis.com/es-url-001> > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > -- Stas Kobzar Developeur VoIP / VoIP Developer ___________________ Modulis.ca Inc. # Bureau / Office: 514-284-2020 x 246 Email: s <http://firstname.lastname>[email protected] https://www.modulis.com <https://www.modulis.com/es-url-001>
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
