Thanks Jeff, I'll post back how it works for me, and for what use case I chose what.
On 6/30/15, Jeff Pyle <[email protected]> wrote: > Since the failure route is triggered by tm, I think you have to t_relay() > the request for the failure path to be taken. Maybe you could t_relay() it > to another proxy with custom headers to indicate how you wanted it to fail, > or even t_relay() it to the same proxy with care to handle it as you see > fit. > > Or, perhaps this. Let's say you have > > route[dostuff] { > stuff(); > } > > You could make your failure route available to the main script by writing > your failure route like this: > > failure_route[failedstuff] { > route[dostuff]; > } > > So that way a true failure would run the same script as if you were to > manually invoke route[dostuff]. > > That's a lot of stuff. Hopefully some of it fits your use case. > > > > - Jeff > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Podrigal, Aron <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Is there a way i can manually make a request fail so that my failure >> route >> would be invoked? I know this may sound weird, but i encountered some >> scenarios that this implementation came to my mind. So i want to know if >> this is possible. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> > -- Aron Podrigal - //Be happy :-) _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
