Done https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/656
On 28 September 2015 at 12:32, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]> wrote: > That is true Pete, > > Could you open a bug report on the GITHUB tracker please ? > > Regards, > > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com > > On 28.09.2015 14:27, Pete Kelly wrote: > > > > On 28 September 2015 at 12:23, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Pete, >> >> You mean that ideally the username part of Contact URI should be preserve >> through TH ? >> > > Yes, and also the domain, which would need to be preserved if the UAS > wanted to 302 to a completely different URI? > > >> >> Regards, >> >> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu >> OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com >> >> On 23.09.2015 11:40, Pete Kelly wrote: >> >> This is something I have noticed for a while now and came across it again >> the other day. >> >> Basically if you are using topology hiding and the UAS sends a 302, the >> data (new $ru) in the Contact header is not persisted to the UAC, meaning >> topology hiding is not valid in a scenario where a 302 may be found. >> >> Is there a known way to get round this currently (am I missing something >> in the docs!) >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing >> [email protected]http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >> > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
