Mediaproxy does implement modern ICE/STUN however the number of clients
that do this are very few.
On 10/15/2015 11:49 AM, Nabeel wrote:
Rtpproxy is only able to relay media (indirectly) through the server,
so this can't achieve what you want.
Some users have said Mediaproxy has ICE capability. If that is so,
then ICE should be able to negotiate direct communication between some
clients.
On 15 Oct 2015 18:36, "Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi.
Today I'm searching for a solution that allows me to use OpenSIPS,
SIP over TCP, end-nodes behind NATs and direct media.
As someone pointed, I'm reading now about MediaProxy module.
However, if I'm right, by using MediaProxy I will get only media
relay. That is, MediaProxy does only provide media relay. Am I right?
I need an way to implement direct media between the end-nodes,
behind NATs. I want to avoid pass the media through the
MediaProxy, due to performance reasons.
Should I give up using MediaProxy and move to RTPProxy? Would it
be a good decision?
When it is better to use MediaProxy, and when it is better to use
RTPProxy?
Any hint will be very helpful!
Best regards.
RODRIGO PIMENTA CARVALHO
Inatel Competence Center
Software
Ph: +55 35 3471 9200 <tel:%2B55%2035%203471%209200> RAMAL 979
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
