Hello Opensips list! I already explained my scenario in this e-mail ( http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/2015-October/032859.html) where the Ack was propagated with wrong CSeq number when using the in-dialog ping options. Vlad did a great job and already correct this bug! ( https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/680)
Now in a scenario where I disabled the in-dialog ping, I faced another issue. I mentioned that sometimes, due to unknown reasons, when I received a Re-Invite immediately followed by an Update, the Update gets forwarded first. The problem is that, since CSeq numbers are not altered, when this inversion happens, my peer rejects the Re-Invite because its CSeq number is lower than the Update one. Probably Opensips has to respect the ordering of in-dialog requests and forward them accordingly, instead of handling them asynchronously and forwarding right away... Best regards, Patrick
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
