Hi Gunjan,

have you checked the opensips logs for any potential errors ? maybe the reload fails.

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 14.01.2016 19:10, Gunjan Korlekar wrote:
Hi Bogdan,

Thanks for the clarification regarding the memory and the ds_list command.
From what I see in the opensipsctl source, the 'opensipsctl dispatcher rmgw' command also runs a 'ds_reload' after running the database query to remove the entry. Hence in my above sequence of operations, the primary storage should have synced with the secondary storage before I ran 'fifo ds_list' and should not have expected data in the ds_list output -

./opensipsctl dispatcher show
dispatcher gateways
+----+-------+------------------+--------+-------+--------+-------+-------------+
| id | setid | destination | socket | flags | weight | attrs | description |
+----+-------+------------------+--------+-------+--------+-------+-------------+
| 5 | 40 | sip:2.2.2.6:5060 <http://2.2.2.6:5060/> | NULL | 0 | 1 | | test1 |
+----+-------+------------------+--------+-------+--------+-------+-------------+

 ./opensipsctl dispatcher rmgw 5 <<<<------ ds_reload here
 ./opensipsctl fifo ds_list <<<----- should show synced output ?
SET_NO:: 1
SET:: 40
URI:: sip:2.2.2.6:5060 <http://2.2.2.6:5060/> flag=A
 ./opensipsctl dispatcher show
dispatcher gateways

I tried the above by running 'fifo ds_reload' explicitly after 'dispatcher rmgw' as well. However I did not see a difference in the result. Can you please help in understanding the issue?

Thanks,
Gunjan

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi Gunjan,

    In dispatcher there are 2 storages:
        - primary storage which is in memory
        - secondary storage (read only at startup or reload) which is
    the DB

    First is about synchronizing the 2 storages (from secondary to
    primary via a ds_reload command). AFter that is about which
    storage you are querying for data. Like the "opensipsctl fifo
    ds_list" (via MI command) gets data from memory cache while the
    "opensipsctl dispatcher show" simply dumps db content.

    Regards,

    Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
    OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
    http://www.opensips-solutions.com

    On 14.01.2016 03:44, Gunjan Korlekar wrote:
    Hello,

    I am observing some unusual behavior of the ds_list command when
    adding and removing gateways in the dispatcher table for opensips 1.8

    I am running the following sequence of commands -

    ./opensipsctl dispatcher addgw 40 sip:2.2.2.4:5060
    <http://2.2.2.4:5060/> 0 'test1'
     ./opensipsctl dispatcher addgw 40 sip:2.2.2.5:5060
    <http://2.2.2.5:5060/> 0 'test1'
     ./opensipsctl dispatcher addgw 40 sip:2.2.2.6:5060
    <http://2.2.2.6:5060/> 0 'test1'

    When I view the dispatcher list using ds_list I see-
     ./opensipsctl fifo ds_list
    SET_NO:: 1
    SET:: 40
    URI:: sip:2.2.2.4:5060 <http://2.2.2.4:5060/> flag=A
    URI:: sip:2.2.2.5:5060 <http://2.2.2.5:5060/> flag=A
    URI:: sip:2.2.2.6:5060 <http://2.2.2.6:5060/> flag=A
    and the ./opensipsctl dispatcher show output is as follows -
    dispatcher gateways
    
+----+-------+------------------+--------+-------+--------+-------+-------------+
    | id | setid | destination      | socket | flags | weight | attrs
    | description |
    
+----+-------+------------------+--------+-------+--------+-------+-------------+
| 3 | 40 | sip:2.2.2.4:5060 <http://2.2.2.4:5060/> | NULL | 0 | 1 | | test1 | | 4 | 40 | sip:2.2.2.5:5060 <http://2.2.2.5:5060/> | NULL | 0 | 1 | | test1 | | 5 | 40 | sip:2.2.2.6:5060 <http://2.2.2.6:5060/> | NULL | 0 | 1 | | test1 |
    
+----+-------+------------------+--------+-------+--------+-------+-------------+

    However when I remove the 3 gateways one after another using
    the ./opensipsctl dispatcher rmgw command. I see that the gateway
    that was removed last can still be seen in the ds_list command
    even though 'dispatcher show' does not show any gateways present.
    Here is the sequence of commands I am executing-

     ./opensipsctl dispatcher rmgw 3
    ./opensipsctl fifo ds_list
    SET_NO:: 1
    SET:: 40
    URI:: sip:2.2.2.5:5060 <http://2.2.2.5:5060/> flag=A
    URI:: sip:2.2.2.6:5060 <http://2.2.2.6:5060/> flag=A
     ./opensipsctl dispatcher show
    dispatcher gateways
    
+----+-------+------------------+--------+-------+--------+-------+-------------+
    | id | setid | destination      | socket | flags | weight | attrs
    | description |
    
+----+-------+------------------+--------+-------+--------+-------+-------------+
| 4 | 40 | sip:2.2.2.5:5060 <http://2.2.2.5:5060/> | NULL | 0 | 1 | | test1 | | 5 | 40 | sip:2.2.2.6:5060 <http://2.2.2.6:5060/> | NULL | 0 | 1 | | test1 |
    
+----+-------+------------------+--------+-------+--------+-------+-------------+

     ./opensipsctl dispatcher rmgw 4
     ./opensipsctl fifo ds_list
    SET_NO:: 1
    SET:: 40
    URI:: sip:2.2.2.6:5060 <http://2.2.2.6:5060/> flag=A
     ./opensipsctl dispatcher show
    dispatcher gateways
    
+----+-------+------------------+--------+-------+--------+-------+-------------+
    | id | setid | destination      | socket | flags | weight | attrs
    | description |
    
+----+-------+------------------+--------+-------+--------+-------+-------------+
| 5 | 40 | sip:2.2.2.6:5060 <http://2.2.2.6:5060/> | NULL | 0 | 1 | | test1 |
    
+----+-------+------------------+--------+-------+--------+-------+-------------+

     ./opensipsctl dispatcher rmgw 5
     ./opensipsctl fifo ds_list
    SET_NO:: 1
    SET:: 40
    URI:: sip:2.2.2.6:5060 <http://2.2.2.6:5060/> flag=A
     ./opensipsctl dispatcher show
    dispatcher gateways


    Can you please help in understanding this behavior? Is this
    expected behavior? Is there something I am missing that needs to
    be done to correct this?

-- Thanks,
    Gunjan


    _______________________________________________
    Users mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users




--
Thanks,
Gunjan

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to