I always set the advertised address in request route. Also as the original issue noted the second INVITE does go out with the correct advertised address in the VIA. It is only the local ACK for the failed second request that contains the wrong address in the VIA. So set_advertised_address appears to be working, but the local generated ACK is not using that address.
Ben Newlin From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bog...@opensips.org> Date: Monday, June 27, 2016 at 5:37 AM To: "users@lists.opensips.org" <users@lists.opensips.org>, "Newlin, Ben" <ben.new...@inin.com> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] ACK after set_advertised_address contains wrong address in VIA header Hi Ben, Where in the script do you do the first advertise_address ? In the request route or in a branch route ? Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 25.06.2016 03:41, Newlin, Ben wrote: I have run into the same problem that was described in this previous post [1], however it doesn’t appear it was ever solved at the time. I am using the dispatcher module to route calls to external carriers and I am using set_advertised_address to set the outgoing public address prior to sending the request. If the first destination returns failure, the ACK is sent correctly. Then I select a different destination and set a different public address using set_advertised_address. If this second call also fails, the ACK that is sent out uses the first advertised address, not the current on for the request. Has anyone figured this out? I am using 1.11.6. [1] http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/2014-August/029779.html Ben Newlin _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org<mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
