Hi Alain,
Thanks for your testing and feedback. We found some issues with the
patch I sent you yesterday, so please consider for usage this second one
(revert the first one please).
Also, I will push this fix on opensips trunk, to get it tested and to be
sure there are no side effects.
Best regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 05.07.2016 10:24, Alain Bieuzent wrote:
Ho bogdan,
Tested your patch this morning, it works.
Many thanks.
Regards
*De : *Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]>
*Date : *lundi 4 juillet 2016 19:08
*À : *Alain Bieuzent <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
*Objet : *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Migrating from 1.11 to 2.1 load
balancer Probing problem
Hi Alain,
Could you please test the following patch.
Thank and regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 04.07.2016 15:34, Alain Bieuzent wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
Yes i compiled form source.
Regards
*De : *Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Date : *lundi 4 juillet 2016 13:03
*À : *Alain Bieuzent <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Objet : *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Migrating from 1.11 to 2.1 load
balancer Probing problem
Hi Alain,
Thanks for the trace, I managed to find out the problem. I can
provide you a fix to test - do you have OpenSIPS compiled from
sources ? or ?
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 01.07.2016 16:56, Alain Bieuzent wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
As i see in trace (see pcap attach) the first sip OTIONS is
send with the correct source IP (..........) to my 2 gateway
(see frame 3 and 4) and later there is 2 other sip OPTIONS
sent with my private IP (............) (see frame 10 and 11).
But all the packet are sending from the same interface
(00:50:56:9a:78:93).
My network configuration :
[....]
######################################################################
## Connectivity
######################################################################
[....]
Thanks.
*De : *Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>
*Date : *vendredi 1 juillet 2016 12:04
*À : *OpenSIPS users mailling list <[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]>, Alain Bieuzent
<[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
*Objet : *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Migrating from 1.11 to 2.1 load
balancer Probing problem
Hello Alain,
You mean when comes to sent to ping a single destination,
there are actually 2 OPTIONS sent out (on different
interfaces) or it alternates (one ping is sent via eth0, the
next one via eth1) ?
if you have a pcap to show the problem, please send it to me
off-list.
Best regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 30.06.2016 12:49, Alain Bieuzent wrote:
Hi all,
I’m currently trying to migrate my opensips V1.11.5 to
V2.1.3.
My server has 3 interfaces:
eth0 with public IP
eth0:0 with public IP provide via a keepalived script
eth1 with a private IP
Opensips listen on IP of eth0:0 and on eth1
Mhomed=no
Since i migrate to V2.1.3, load balancer probing is UP and
down. After checking traffic, i find for each gateway used
by load balancer table, there is 2 SIP OPTIONS sent.
-First is sent with source IP of eth0:0
-Second is sent with source IP of eth1
Any idea ?
Thanls
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
diff --git a/forward.c b/forward.c
index 16f40ae..22156f3 100644
--- a/forward.c
+++ b/forward.c
@@ -223,12 +223,10 @@ struct socket_info* get_send_socket(struct sip_msg *msg,
* eg: ipv4 -> ipv6 or ipv6 -> ipv4) */
switch(proto){
case PROTO_UDP:
- if
((bind_address)&&(to->s.sa_family==bind_address->address.af)&&
- (bind_address->proto==PROTO_UDP)) {
- send_sock = (msg &&
-
msg->rcv.bind_address->address.af==bind_address->address.af &&
-
msg->rcv.bind_address->proto==bind_address->proto) ?
- msg->rcv.bind_address : bind_address;
+ if (msg &&
+ msg->rcv.bind_address->address.af==to->s.sa_family &&
+ msg->rcv.bind_address->proto==PROTO_UDP) {
+ send_sock = msg->rcv.bind_address;
break;
}
/* default logic for all protos */
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
