Conceptually, To tags are governed by the UAs, not the proxy, so, like
most fundamental elements of SIP messages, the proxy has no business
removing them. :-)
On 10/21/2016 05:41 PM, Daniel Zanutti wrote:
Hi
Short:
Do you guys see any problem on removing the to-tag of all 1XX messages?
Long description:
If user A calls number 2222. Opensips forward to gateway B which replies
with 183 session progress, then refuses with 503.
Opensips then call gateway C which replies with 183 then 200 OK.
User A now is using to-tag from gateway A and not from gateway B and I
have an unexpected result on subsequent messages.
Do you guys see any problem on removing the to-tag of all 1XX messages?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 (direct) / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users