Conceptually, To tags are governed by the UAs, not the proxy, so, like most fundamental elements of SIP messages, the proxy has no business removing them. :-)

On 10/21/2016 05:41 PM, Daniel Zanutti wrote:

Hi

Short:
Do you guys see any problem on removing the to-tag of all 1XX messages?


Long description:
If user A calls number 2222. Opensips forward to gateway B which replies
with 183 session progress, then refuses with 503.

Opensips then call gateway C which replies with 183 then 200 OK.

User A now is using to-tag from gateway A and not from gateway B and I
have an unexpected result on subsequent messages.

Do you guys see any problem on removing the to-tag of all 1XX messages?

Thanks


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users



--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC

Tel: +1-706-510-6800 (direct) / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to