Hi, Ehrny!
You need the IP address of whom? Caller? Callee?
$rd is null because a reply does not have a R-URI. Perhaps the reply
doesn't have a received parameter in the reply either, that's why it is
empty.
Best regards,
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
www.opensips-solutions.com
On 11/21/2016 12:13 PM, Ehrny wrote:
Hello Răzvan,
I need to do some routing in onreply_route[] based on destination IP.
Tried $rd with no avail , it returns null
If I get you right regarding context, the var $var(upstream0) =
$(hdr(Via)[0]{via.received}); Is empty also.
What is the right way to get an IP address in replies and do further
routing?
Kind regards,
Ehrny
*From:*[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Razvan Crainea
*Sent:* Monday, November 21, 2016 11:50 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation
Hi, Ehrny!
You don't need to use contexts in the onreply_route[], because that
route is already ran in the context of the reply message.
Best regards,
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
www.opensips-solutions.com <http://www.opensips-solutions.com>
On 11/19/2016 10:40 PM, Ehrny wrote:
Dear Răzvan,
… I’ve tried to add variable to onreply_route[1]
$var(upstream0) = $(<reply>hdr(Via)[0]{via.param,received});
xlog("upstream0 = $var(upstream0) \n");
and in the log I get critical alert:
CRITICAL:tm:tm_pv_context_reply: no picked branch (-1) for a final
response
*From:*[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ehrny
*Sent:* Saturday, November 19, 2016 2:06 PM
*To:* OpenSIPS users mailling list
*Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation
Hi Răzvan,
I gues so.
I’ve got t_on_reply("1"); in the route
and at the end of the script there is:
onreply_route[1] {
force_send_socket(udp:10.197.26.170:5060);
}
But it doesn’t seem to change send_socket back to priv IP addr ((
Kind regards,
Ehrny
*From:*[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
[mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Razvan
Crainea
*Sent:* Friday, November 18, 2016 12:22 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] $ai transformation
Hi, Ehrny!
Did you try setting the private socket on the reply?
Best regards,
Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
www.opensips-solutions.com <http://www.opensips-solutions.com>
On 11/17/2016 01:00 AM, Ehrny wrote:
Dear Răzvan,
Thanks again for the prompt help. I was able to change the
headers as needed but I’m stuck with another problem(
I’ve got opensips with two Ethernet adapters, eth1 as a
private and another one eth0 as public. Opensips works fine
when the call is coming on the public eth0 and leaves opensips
through the same public adapter. (All the GWs are behind that
public eth0 instead of one ). The problem happens when the
call comes in through the private eth1, please see the drawing
in attachment.
-sip1. After I’ve got invite from provider on the private
eth1 , I send it through the public eth0.
-sip2. I use force_send_socket(udp:PUBLIC_IP:PORT) for the
call to be able to pass through the opensips and come back
from external GW (x.x.82.139). I also change SIP Request's URI
and use uac_replace_to () to change these fields as needed.
-sip4. Opensips has got 180 Ringing from external GW
(x.x.82.139)
-sip5. Opensips tries to send it back to originator
(10.250.242.74) which is behind private NIC eth0 (10.197.26.170)
the call can not be set up because I send reply from my public
eth1
2016-11-16 18:56:14 : x.x.80.43:5060 -> 10.250.242.74:5060
SIP/2.0 *180* Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.250.242.74:5060;branch=*z9hG4bKqci5ec *Record-Route:
<sip:x.x.80.43;r2=on;lr;ftag=*2F81324631*;did=3a2.4667b68
<sip:x.x.80.43;r2=on;lr;ftag=2F81324631353641A405EA00;did=3a2.4667b68>>
Record-Route:
<sip:10.197.26.170;r2=on;lr;ftag=*2F81324631*;did=3a2.4667b68
<sip:10.197.26.170;r2=on;lr;ftag=2F81324631353641A405EA00;did=3a2.4667b68>>
From: sip:[email protected];tag=*2F81324631*
<sip:[email protected];tag=2F81324631353641A405EA00> To:
sip:[email protected]:5060;tag=231469dIr894
<sip:[email protected]:5060;tag=231469dIr894p0D461D0t66>
Call-ID: *020A3EA03A8@SFESIP4-id1-ext* CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact:
<sip:[email protected]:5060>
I’m not sure if I do it right way because the packet (sip5)
goes to 10.250.242.74 with the source ip of public eth0 and
not the one it should pass through to be able to come back.
What is the right way in my case to get the call through?
Thank you for all of your help,
Regards,
Ehrny
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
