Hi Jeff,

Somehow it's very difficult to accept your report, as both IPv4 and IPv6 are handled (in terms of reporting) exactly in the same way. Are the logs from "pipport2su" showing the same IPs too ?

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com

On 02/10/2017 04:29 PM, Jeff Pyle wrote:
Bogdan,

Yes. Here's a Homer DB record written on the capture server from the HEP packet:

          date: 2017-02-10 09:08:04
        method: REGISTER
via_1: SIP/2.0/TLS [2607:FB90:1234:5678:9ABC:DEF0:955D:F1E5]:60640;branch=z9hG4bKo9TPB60p8Y2aQLbm;rport
     source_ip: 2607:FB90:1234:5678:9ABC:DEF0:955D:F1E5
destination_ip: 2607:FB90:1234:5678:9ABC:DEF0:955D:F1E5

(IPs mangled to protect the guilty.)


- Jeff


On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Jeff,

    So, for the REGISTER request, in HEP, you have as both src and dst
    the incoming IP of the request ??

    Regards,

    Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
    OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
    http://www.opensips-solutions.com <http://www.opensips-solutions.com>

    On 02/08/2017 11:12 PM, Jeff Pyle wrote:
    Bogdan and team,
    This does appear to fix the source interface issue ... at least
    for IPv4.  On IPv6, the errors are gone, but the source address
    is being reported as both the source and destination address for
    a message in siptrace.
    I'm using the following:

        listen=hep_udp:127.0.0.1:4530 <http://127.0.0.1:4530> children=1
        listen=hep_udp:[::1]:4530 children=1     # Not doing anything
        loadmodule "proto_hep.so"
        modparam("proto_hep", "hep_id", "[heppy] 127.0.0.1:9060
        <http://127.0.0.1:9060>; version=3; transport=udp")
        loadmodule "siptrace.so"
        modparam("siptrace", "trace_on", 1)
        modparam("siptrace", "trace_id", "[tid]uri=hep:heppy")

    I was looking at a registration in this particular case captured
    with sip_trace("tid", "t").
    - Jeff
    On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Ionut Ionita
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        It's not that syntax anymore, but the docs weren't updated.
        Now you have to declare an hep_id

        in proto_hep like:

        /modparam("proto_hep", "hep_id", "[heppy] 10.0.0.135:6061
        <http://10.0.0.135:6061>; version=3; transport=tcp")/

        then in sip_trace you have to declare a trace_id like:

        /  modparam("siptrace", "trace_id", "[hep_id]uri=hep:heppy")/

        The docs will be updated soon.

        Regards,

        Ionut Ionita
        OpenSIPS Developer

        On 02/07/2017 04:27 AM, Jeff Pyle wrote:
        Hi Bogdan,
        Now it won't start.  I see the following errors on config check:

            Feb  6 21:21:03 [30051]
            ERROR:siptrace:parse_siptrace_uri: Invalid key <version>
            in trace id!
            Feb  6 21:21:03 [30051]
            ERROR:siptrace:parse_siptrace_id: invalid uri
            <3;transport=udp;>
            Feb  6 21:21:03 [30051] ERROR:siptrace:parse_trace_id:
            failed to parse siptrace uri [3;transport=udp;]
            Feb  6 21:21:03 [30051] CRITICAL:core:yyerror: parse
            error in config file
            /usr/local//etc/opensips/opensips.cfg, line 225, column
            20-21: Parameter <trace_id> not found in module
            <siptrace> - can't set
            Feb  6 21:21:03 [30051] ERROR:core:main: bad config file
            (1 errors)
            Feb  6 21:21:03 [30051] NOTICE:core:main: Exiting....

        The script has:

               223loadmodule "siptrace.so"
               224modparam("siptrace", "trace_on", 1)
               225modparam("siptrace", "trace_id",
            "[tid]uri=hep:127.0.0.1:9060
            <http://127.0.0.1:9060>;version=3;transport=udp;")

        This is on 2.3/devel git revision 2bcf891 from around 01:00
        UTC Feb 07.
        - Jeff
        On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            Hi Jeff, Thank you for detailed report. I was able to
            reproduce and fix it. Please see:
            
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/b30af734cdb84991e1f906e3920a94e87c33ea04
            
<https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/commit/b30af734cdb84991e1f906e3920a94e87c33ea04>
            If you confirm the fix, I will do the backporting to 2.2
            too. Thanks and Regards,

            Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
            OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
            http://www.opensips-solutions.com
            <http://www.opensips-solutions.com>

            On 02/04/2017 04:41 AM, Jeff Pyle wrote:
            Hello,
            I recently enabled siptrace on an OpenSIPS 2.2.2 system
            acting as a registrar and a proxy.  It has one IPv4
            address with several ports for UDP, TCP and TLS.  In a
            case where the INVITE is relayed from TLS to UDP, the
            replies to the UAC are incorrectly being reported as
            coming from the UDP socket.
            In the below scenario the UAC is at 64.65.66.67, and
its ephemeral TCP client port for this call is 61235. The OpenSIPS proxy is at 131.132.133.134 listening on
            UDP 5060 and TLS 5061.  Also on 131.132.133.134 there
is a Freeswitch media server listening on UDP 5080. The UAC sends an INVITE to the proxy over TLS which
            routes it to the media server over UDP. The replies
            relayed to the UAC are reported as having come from
            port 5060 over UDP when in reality they have come from
            port 5061 over TCP (TLS).
            My config:

                listen=udp:131.132.133.134:5060
                <http://131.132.133.134:5060>
                listen=tls:131.132.133.134:5061
                <http://131.132.133.134:5061>
                listen=hep_udp:127.0.0.1:9030 <http://127.0.0.1:9030>
                loadmodule "siptrace.so"
                modparam("siptrace", "trace_on", 1)
                modparam("siptrace", "trace_id",
                "[hep]uri=hep:127.0.0.1:9060
                <http://127.0.0.1:9060>;transport=udp;")

            Debugs:

                INVITE in from UAC over TLS
                Feb  3 21:20:22 testproxy
                /usr/sbin/opensips[24673]: DBG:siptrace:pipport2su:
                proto 22, host 64.65.66.67 , port 61235
                Feb  3 21:20:22 testproxy
                /usr/sbin/opensips[24673]: DBG:siptrace:pipport2su:
                proto 22, host 131.132.133.134 , port 5061
                INVITE out to media server over UDP
                Feb  3 21:20:22 testproxy
                /usr/sbin/opensips[24673]: DBG:siptrace:pipport2su:
                proto 17, host 131.132.133.134 , port 5060
                Feb  3 21:20:22 testproxy
                /usr/sbin/opensips[24673]: DBG:siptrace:pipport2su:
                proto 17, host 131.132.133.134 , port 5080
                100 Trying in from media server over UDP
                Feb  3 21:20:22 testproxy
                /usr/sbin/opensips[24650]: DBG:siptrace:pipport2su:
                proto 17, host 131.132.133.134 , port 5080
                Feb  3 21:20:22 testproxy
                /usr/sbin/opensips[24650]: DBG:siptrace:pipport2su:
                proto 17, host 131.132.133.134 , port 5060
                180 Ringing in from media server over UDP
                Feb  3 21:20:22 testproxy
                /usr/sbin/opensips[24651]: DBG:siptrace:pipport2su:
                proto 17, host 131.132.133.134 , port 5080
                Feb  3 21:20:22 testproxy
                /usr/sbin/opensips[24651]: DBG:siptrace:pipport2su:
                proto 17, host 131.132.133.134 , port 5060
                180 Ringing out to UAC over TLS (even though it
                reports UDP)
                Feb  3 21:20:22 testproxy
                /usr/sbin/opensips[24651]: DBG:siptrace:pipport2su:
                proto 17, host 131.132.133.134 , port 5060
                Feb  3 21:20:22 testproxy
                /usr/sbin/opensips[24651]: DBG:siptrace:pipport2su:
                proto 22, host 64.65.66.67 , port 61235
                200 OK in from media server over UDP
                Feb  3 21:20:22 testproxy
                /usr/sbin/opensips[24651]: DBG:siptrace:pipport2su:
                proto 17, host 131.132.133.134 , port 5080
                Feb  3 21:20:22 testproxy
                /usr/sbin/opensips[24651]: DBG:siptrace:pipport2su:
                proto 17, host 131.132.133.134 , port 5060
                200 OK out to UAC over TLS (even though it reports udp)
                Feb  3 21:20:22 testproxy
                /usr/sbin/opensips[24651]: DBG:siptrace:pipport2su:
                proto 17, host 131.132.133.134 , port 5060
                Feb  3 21:20:22 testproxy
                /usr/sbin/opensips[24651]: DBG:siptrace:pipport2su:
                proto 22, host 64.65.66.67 , port 61235
                ACK in from UAC over TLS
                Feb  3 21:20:23 testproxy
                /usr/sbin/opensips[24673]: DBG:siptrace:pipport2su:
                proto 22, host 64.65.66.67 , port 61235
                Feb  3 21:20:23 testproxy
                /usr/sbin/opensips[24673]: DBG:siptrace:pipport2su:
                proto 22, host 131.132.133.134 , port 5061
                ACK out to media server over UDP
                Feb  3 21:20:23 testproxy
                /usr/sbin/opensips[24673]: DBG:siptrace:pipport2su:
                proto 17, host 131.132.133.134 , port 5060
                Feb  3 21:20:23 testproxy
                /usr/sbin/opensips[24673]: DBG:siptrace:pipport2su:
                proto 17, host 131.132.133.134 , port 5080

            Everything routes properly, but it isn't reported by
            siptrace properly.  Is this a bug or am I doing
            something wrong?
            - Jeff

            _______________________________________________
            Users mailing list
            [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
            <http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>

        _______________________________________________
        Users mailing list
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
        <http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>
        _______________________________________________ Users mailing
        list [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
<http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to